News
» Go to news main2024 Smith Shield Moot Results
More than 150 Schulich School of Law students, faculty and guests attended this yearās Smith Shield Moot, which took place at the Weldon Law Building on October 9, 2024. With a tradition dating back to 1927, Smith Shield competitors are chosen from the top mooters in the compulsory second-year moot.
This yearās mooters were Alex Harrison, Machel Maxwell, Rachel McMillan, and Anu Sidhu, arguing the case ofĢżSylvia Vaughn v. Derrick Chandler beforeĢżthe Honourable Chief Justice Michael J. Wood, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; the Honourable Justice Robin C.M. Gogan, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; and Michelle Kelly, KC, First Vice-President, Nova Scotia Barristersā Society. Harrison and Maxwell represented the appellant, Derrick Chandler; McMillan and Sidhu represented the respondent, Sylvia Vaughn.
The 2024 competition examined when and how a person should have control over their images and personal information. Schulich Law Assistant Professor Suzie Dunn, acting director of the Law & Technology Institute, served as coachĢżand also drafted the problem.
"I designed this yearās problem to address some of the challenges we face with protecting our identity and sexual privacy in the digital era,ā says Dunn. āOften these types of cases are discussed in the context of intimate sexual partners or celebrities, but I wanted the students to grapple with these issues in a more complex and nuanced fact scenario that reflects the challenges that people, and sex workers in particular, face when engaging in life online. It was also a problem with little established case law, which required the students to be innovative with their arguments.ā
According to the case, Ms. Sylvia Vaughn runs a personal camgirl website where she livestreams herself in the nude engaging in sexual behaviours for the people viewing the session. Recently the defendant Mr. Derrick Chandler, another parent from her sonās school, sent screenshots of her nude images to the principal, teachers, and members of her sonās school board. After this incident, Mr. Chandler used one of the images he had screenshotted of Ms.ĢżVaughn along with her name on the cover of an e-book he was selling about how to advocate against sexual images online.
Ms. Vaughn commenced an action under theĢżIntimate Images and Cyber-Protection Act, claiming that her intimate images were distributed without her consent. She also brought an action under the tort of appropriation of personality.

From left: the Honourable Chief Justice Michael J. Wood, Alex Hamilton, Rachel McMillan, Anu Sidhu, Machel Maxwell, the Honourable Justice Robin C.M. Gogan, Michelle Kelly, K.C. (Photo by Bruce Bottomley)
The Supreme Moot Court of Dalhousie was asked to determine if theĢżIntimate Images and Cyber-Protection ActĢżapplied to the defendantās emails containing the plaintiffās images, and if the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her intimate images.
The Court also considered whether the tort of appropriation of personality applied to the book the defendant sold with the plaintiffās name, image, and story.
āThis yearās moot team was incredibly strong, they worked together seamlessly and put a lot of hours in supporting each other in their practices. Sensitive topics like this are difficult to discuss and they handled it with such professionalism and poise,ā says Dunn. āI was so impressed with them. They will be great lawyers.ā
The winners of the 2024 Smith Shield Moot were Rachel McMillan and Anu Sidhu who received the A.S. Pattillo Prize in Advocacy. The runners-up were Alex Harrison and Machel Maxwell who were recognized with the Leonard A. Kitz Prize in Advocacy. David Gouws served as this yearās alternate.

Rachel McMillan and Anu Sidhu. (Photo by Bruce Bottomley)
āIt was such an honour to be selected to participate, and I accepted a place on the team knowing it would be a challenge that pushed me outside of my comfort zone,ā says McMillan. āIt certainly did just that, but that is what makes the experience so rewarding! I feel very proud of the efforts we all made, and very grateful for the opportunity to learn from my classmates and our amazing coach.ā
Sidhu says it meant a lot to her to represent Schulich Law alongside her classmates in the Smith Shield.Ģż āA lot of preparation went into the moot and it was incredibly gratifying to see it all pay off. Professor Dunn played a huge role in that preparation, so our pilipiliĀž» also serves as a testament to her efforts.ā
Associate Dean (Academic) Professor Jodi Lazare says the students should be very proud of their performances. āThe mooters, frankly, blew my socks off. I know how hard they worked leading up to the event and that hard work paid off in spades. They were simply excellent." Ģż
Congratulations to the students who took part in this yearās Smith Shield Moot and thank you to our judges and everyone who contributed to making this year's event a pilipiliĀž». We look forward to continuing the tradition next year!
Ģż
Recent News
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Legal columnist looks at constitutional storm circling "notwithstanding clause""
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Federal minister denies political motivation in choosing Cape Breton to pilot gun buyback program"
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Could amendments to the Crown Lands Act face constitutional challenges?"
- Meet Schulich Fellow Leanna Katz
- Associate Professor Michael Karanicolas ft in "āHard choices aheadā: Canada risks getting caught in an U.S.āEU tugāofāwar over tech rules"
- New Book by Schulich Law Student Aims to Empower Youth in Care
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Legal columnist looks at Canadian classāaction lawsuit against menstruation app"
- Associate Professor Michael Karanicolas ft in "Why Trump's TikTok deal with China leaves Canada with 'worst of all worlds'"